We have put together a comparison of various published outcome frameworks to our survey results and the IEEE RCD specification. This is intended to illustrate what types of data are currently being published with respect to the definition of competencies. The frameworks used in the above comparison are:
- AACN General Patient Care Competencies
- ACGME Competencies
- Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Competencies
- CanMEDS Specialty Competencies
- Good Medical Practice (UK)
- Good Medical Practice (USA)
- Pharmacy competencies (see pages 8-10) and pharmacy residency learning outcomes
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's CanMEDS 2005
- The Scottish Doctor
- Tomorrow's Doctors
- Tuning (MEDINE 1)
- Womens Healthcare Competencies
Examples of how three of these frameworks could be represented in the MedBiq conceptual model have been prepared:
Some other outcomes frameworks:
- TUSK Competency Framework Project
- Tufts Dental Competencies Representation
- University of Edinburgh Competencies Briefing
- Healthstream Competency Dictionary
- Joint Commission Nursing Requirements Summary
- Outcomes for Personal Adaptive Learning, University of Edinburgh
- Vanderbilt Healthcare Matrix
- Vanderbilt Geriatrics Curriculum Matrix
- Virginia XML-Oriented competency definitions
- Royal Australasian College of Surgery (Competencies with levels)
- AACN Synergy Model (Competencies with levels)
- Pediatric Milestones: Framework and Relation to outcomes
- Entrustable Professional Activities
- American Surgical (SCORE) curriculum
.